https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43529 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking the return of a seized amount of Rs. 54,600, emphasizing the petitioner's failure to establish ownership by not making a timely claim after the seizure. The court noted ongoing adjudication proceedings related to the seizure and deemed it inappropriate to address ownership in the writ petition. The judgment underscores the significance of adhering to legal procedures and resolving disputes through proper channels like adjudication proceedings, allowing the petitioner the opportunity to establish her claim in that forum. en-us Tue, 19 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:49:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43529 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking the return of a seized amount of Rs. 54,600, emphasizing the petitioner's failure to establish ownership by not making a timely claim after the seizure. The court noted ongoing adjudication proceedings related to the seizure and deemed it inappropriate to address ownership in the writ petition. The judgment underscores the significance of adhering to legal procedures and resolving disputes through proper channels like adjudication proceedings, allowing the petitioner the opportunity to establish her claim in that forum. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 19 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43529