<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 632 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770360</link>
    <description>DHC in W.P.(C) 5703/2025 addressed a GST dispute involving alleged fake input tax credit claims. The court directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority within 30 days, deposit remaining pre-deposit, and ensured the appeal would be considered on merits. The order preserved the petitioner&#039;s rights and mandated fair review of the original GST demand of Rs. 27.15 crores.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 09:12:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 632 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770360</link>
      <description>DHC in W.P.(C) 5703/2025 addressed a GST dispute involving alleged fake input tax credit claims. The court directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority within 30 days, deposit remaining pre-deposit, and ensured the appeal would be considered on merits. The order preserved the petitioner&#039;s rights and mandated fair review of the original GST demand of Rs. 27.15 crores.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>