<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 561 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770289</link>
    <description>HC dismissed a writ petition challenging tax authorities&#039; findings on fraudulent input tax credit (ITC) claims. The court upheld Section 74 of CGST Act, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s arguments about ITC availment through non-existent firms. The court emphasized that mere invoices are insufficient to claim ITC without actual goods receipt, and mandated statutory deposit requirements must be followed. The petition was dismissed, preserving the original tax order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 20:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 561 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770289</link>
      <description>HC dismissed a writ petition challenging tax authorities&#039; findings on fraudulent input tax credit (ITC) claims. The court upheld Section 74 of CGST Act, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s arguments about ITC availment through non-existent firms. The court emphasized that mere invoices are insufficient to claim ITC without actual goods receipt, and mandated statutory deposit requirements must be followed. The petition was dismissed, preserving the original tax order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>