https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461925 An adjudicating authority's order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was challenged as time-barred because it was passed after the statutory period under Section 8(3). The challenge also questioned whether the Supreme Court's COVID-19 limitation-extension orders could apply to the authority's timeline. A prima facie view was taken that such extension benefit may not have been available, and that the authority may have become functus officio when the order was made. Interim stay was granted on the impugned order, and notice was issued. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jun 2026 18:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461925 An adjudicating authority's order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was challenged as time-barred because it was passed after the statutory period under Section 8(3). The challenge also questioned whether the Supreme Court's COVID-19 limitation-extension orders could apply to the authority's timeline. A prima facie view was taken that such extension benefit may not have been available, and that the authority may have become functus officio when the order was made. Interim stay was granted on the impugned order, and notice was issued. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461925