<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1632 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461932</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad set aside CIT(A)&#039;s dismissal of assessee&#039;s appeal for non-payment of advance tax under section 249(4)(b). The tribunal held that advance tax payment requirement does not apply when appealing against reassessment orders, following precedent in Deepak Khandelwal case. Since the original assessment was passed ex-parte and CIT(A) did not adjudicate on merits, the matter was remanded to AO for fresh adjudication with proper hearing opportunity for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 18:55:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1632 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461932</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad set aside CIT(A)&#039;s dismissal of assessee&#039;s appeal for non-payment of advance tax under section 249(4)(b). The tribunal held that advance tax payment requirement does not apply when appealing against reassessment orders, following precedent in Deepak Khandelwal case. Since the original assessment was passed ex-parte and CIT(A) did not adjudicate on merits, the matter was remanded to AO for fresh adjudication with proper hearing opportunity for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>