https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43516 A non-speaking rejection of special leave in a co-accused's matter does not affirm the High Court's reasoning or create merger, so an appeal by accused persons for whom leave has been granted must be examined independently on its own merits. The evidence also did not establish a shared common object or common intention to commit murder: the occurrence was a sudden fight after an earlier altercation, and the injuries were not shown to support murder liability under Section 302 IPC. Murder and group liability were set aside, and the convictions were confined to the lesser offences proved against each appellant. en-us Tue, 13 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jul 2014 08:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43516 A non-speaking rejection of special leave in a co-accused's matter does not affirm the High Court's reasoning or create merger, so an appeal by accused persons for whom leave has been granted must be examined independently on its own merits. The evidence also did not establish a shared common object or common intention to commit murder: the occurrence was a sudden fight after an earlier altercation, and the injuries were not shown to support murder liability under Section 302 IPC. Murder and group liability were set aside, and the convictions were confined to the lesser offences proved against each appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43516