<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Strikes Down GST Rule 86A Order, Restores Electronic Credit Ledger Access for Taxpayer Without Proper Procedural Justification</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88174</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the petition, quashing the impugned order blocking the petitioner&#039;s Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) under Rule 86A of CGST Rules. The court found the order legally unsustainable due to absence of pre-decisional hearing and lack of independent, cogent reasons for blocking the ECL. The respondents&#039; reliance on borrowed satisfaction from enforcement authorities was deemed impermissible. The order&#039;s failure to provide substantive reasons for blocking the ECL, coupled with procedural irregularities, necessitated its quashing, thereby restoring the petitioner&#039;s access to the electronic credit ledger.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Strikes Down GST Rule 86A Order, Restores Electronic Credit Ledger Access for Taxpayer Without Proper Procedural Justification</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88174</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the petition, quashing the impugned order blocking the petitioner&#039;s Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) under Rule 86A of CGST Rules. The court found the order legally unsustainable due to absence of pre-decisional hearing and lack of independent, cogent reasons for blocking the ECL. The respondents&#039; reliance on borrowed satisfaction from enforcement authorities was deemed impermissible. The order&#039;s failure to provide substantive reasons for blocking the ECL, coupled with procedural irregularities, necessitated its quashing, thereby restoring the petitioner&#039;s access to the electronic credit ledger.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>