<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 151 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43511</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appropriate authority. The appellate authority was directed to entertain the appeal without raising any objection on limitation and to decide it in accordance with law. The operative effect was to preserve the petitioner&#039;s right to pursue the statutory appellate remedy and to prevent rejection on limitation grounds at the threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:05:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 151 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43511</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appropriate authority. The appellate authority was directed to entertain the appeal without raising any objection on limitation and to decide it in accordance with law. The operative effect was to preserve the petitioner&#039;s right to pursue the statutory appellate remedy and to prevent rejection on limitation grounds at the threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>