<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Dispute Resolved: Transfer Pricing Adjustment, Deduction Claims Validated with 3% Margin Tolerance Under Specified Sections</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88154</link>
    <description>The ITAT addressed transfer pricing and tax deduction matters. In the TP adjustment, the tribunal remanded the case to the TPO/AO to determine arm&#039;s length pricing using TNNM method, with a 3% tolerance range for operating margin. For weighted deduction under section 35(2AB), the tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim consistently with a prior year&#039;s order. Regarding additional depreciation under section 32(iia), the tribunal directed the AO to comply with DRP&#039;s instructions and allow the depreciation claim, criticizing the AO&#039;s failure to implement previous directions. The decision emphasizes procedural compliance and consistent interpretation of tax regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Dispute Resolved: Transfer Pricing Adjustment, Deduction Claims Validated with 3% Margin Tolerance Under Specified Sections</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88154</link>
      <description>The ITAT addressed transfer pricing and tax deduction matters. In the TP adjustment, the tribunal remanded the case to the TPO/AO to determine arm&#039;s length pricing using TNNM method, with a 3% tolerance range for operating margin. For weighted deduction under section 35(2AB), the tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim consistently with a prior year&#039;s order. Regarding additional depreciation under section 32(iia), the tribunal directed the AO to comply with DRP&#039;s instructions and allow the depreciation claim, criticizing the AO&#039;s failure to implement previous directions. The decision emphasizes procedural compliance and consistent interpretation of tax regulations.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>