https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43509 Pending the appellate tribunal's decision, duty on the product was to be recovered on the footing that it fell under Tariff Entry 4823.90 and qualified for Exemption Notification No. 135/89-C.E. The Court did not finally decide the classification or exemption dispute in the petition. Instead, it followed the interim approach used in connected matters and protected the revenue interest by requiring the differential duty to remain secured through bank guarantees until the appeal was decided. en-us Mon, 05 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:02:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43509 Pending the appellate tribunal's decision, duty on the product was to be recovered on the footing that it fell under Tariff Entry 4823.90 and qualified for Exemption Notification No. 135/89-C.E. The Court did not finally decide the classification or exemption dispute in the petition. Instead, it followed the interim approach used in connected matters and protected the revenue interest by requiring the differential duty to remain secured through bank guarantees until the appeal was decided. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43509