<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Discharge Voucher No Bar: Arbitration Possible After Settlement, Tribunal&#039;s Jurisdiction Upheld Under Sections 8 and 11</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88146</link>
    <description>SC held that a dispute can be referred to arbitration even after an insured party signs a discharge voucher. The court emphasized the Kompetenz-Kompetenz doctrine, which allows arbitral tribunals to determine their own jurisdiction. The legislative intent is to minimize judicial intervention at the arbitrator appointment stage. Under Sections 8 and 11 of the Arbitration Act, courts must refer matters to arbitration unless there is a clear prima facie case of non-existence of a valid arbitration agreement. Questions regarding economic duress or partial payment are within the arbitral tribunal&#039;s domain. The High Court&#039;s order rejecting the arbitration application was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Discharge Voucher No Bar: Arbitration Possible After Settlement, Tribunal&#039;s Jurisdiction Upheld Under Sections 8 and 11</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88146</link>
      <description>SC held that a dispute can be referred to arbitration even after an insured party signs a discharge voucher. The court emphasized the Kompetenz-Kompetenz doctrine, which allows arbitral tribunals to determine their own jurisdiction. The legislative intent is to minimize judicial intervention at the arbitrator appointment stage. Under Sections 8 and 11 of the Arbitration Act, courts must refer matters to arbitration unless there is a clear prima facie case of non-existence of a valid arbitration agreement. Questions regarding economic duress or partial payment are within the arbitral tribunal&#039;s domain. The High Court&#039;s order rejecting the arbitration application was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>