<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 477 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770205</link>
    <description>CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal regarding refund of Additional Customs Duties, CVD, SAD, and Education Cess paid after cancellation of export orders under Advance License scheme. The tribunal held that appellants properly followed prescribed procedures when unable to fulfill export obligations and voluntarily paid applicable duties. The duties paid were equivalent to excise duty and eligible for CENVAT credit under previous regime. Under GST transition provisions in Section 142 of CGST Act 2017, cash refund of excess CENVAT credit is permissible. The Commissioner&#039;s rejection of refund claim was contrary to legal provisions and not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 477 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770205</link>
      <description>CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal regarding refund of Additional Customs Duties, CVD, SAD, and Education Cess paid after cancellation of export orders under Advance License scheme. The tribunal held that appellants properly followed prescribed procedures when unable to fulfill export obligations and voluntarily paid applicable duties. The duties paid were equivalent to excise duty and eligible for CENVAT credit under previous regime. Under GST transition provisions in Section 142 of CGST Act 2017, cash refund of excess CENVAT credit is permissible. The Commissioner&#039;s rejection of refund claim was contrary to legal provisions and not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>