<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 481 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770209</link>
    <description>In a high sea sale transaction, the SC ruled that a purchaser can claim CENVAT credit on service tax paid, even if invoices are in the original importer&#039;s name. The court rejected a technical interpretation of Rule 9 of CENVAT Credit Rules, emphasizing substance over form. The appellant, having cleared goods through customs and paid duties, was deemed entitled to the tax credit, overturning the revenue&#039;s narrow restrictive approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 481 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770209</link>
      <description>In a high sea sale transaction, the SC ruled that a purchaser can claim CENVAT credit on service tax paid, even if invoices are in the original importer&#039;s name. The court rejected a technical interpretation of Rule 9 of CENVAT Credit Rules, emphasizing substance over form. The appellant, having cleared goods through customs and paid duties, was deemed entitled to the tax credit, overturning the revenue&#039;s narrow restrictive approach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>