<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 489 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770217</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing service tax demand by Rs. 49,141/- for one contract involving material supply. Other service contracts were held taxable in full. The appellant&#039;s Cenvat credit claim was upheld. Interest and penalty were imposed for non-payment of confirmed tax demand. The court rejected multiple adjournment requests and heard the matter on merits, emphasizing strict compliance with service tax regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 489 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770217</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing service tax demand by Rs. 49,141/- for one contract involving material supply. Other service contracts were held taxable in full. The appellant&#039;s Cenvat credit claim was upheld. Interest and penalty were imposed for non-payment of confirmed tax demand. The court rejected multiple adjournment requests and heard the matter on merits, emphasizing strict compliance with service tax regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>