<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (5) TMI 25 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43505</link>
    <description>Section 18 of the Customs Act permits provisional assessment where further inquiry is needed, but the security required must be justified by relevant material and the assessing officer&#039;s own discretion. Rule 2 of the Provisional Duty Assessment Regulations sets the security framework and cash-deposit ceiling, but does not make a bank guarantee mandatory in every case. Mere quotations were insufficient to support an inference of under-invoicing, and prior clearance of similar consignments on bond alone weakened the insistence on additional security. The provisional clearance condition was therefore confined to execution of a bond, while inquiry could continue if supported by proper material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:48:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (5) TMI 25 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43505</link>
      <description>Section 18 of the Customs Act permits provisional assessment where further inquiry is needed, but the security required must be justified by relevant material and the assessing officer&#039;s own discretion. Rule 2 of the Provisional Duty Assessment Regulations sets the security framework and cash-deposit ceiling, but does not make a bank guarantee mandatory in every case. Mere quotations were insufficient to support an inference of under-invoicing, and prior clearance of similar consignments on bond alone weakened the insistence on additional security. The provisional clearance condition was therefore confined to execution of a bond, while inquiry could continue if supported by proper material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>