<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 507 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770235</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi quashed an assessment order framed under section 143(3) due to jurisdictional defects. The notice under section 143(2) was issued by ITO Ward 38(2) New Delhi, but the assessment was completed by ITO Ward 5(2)(3) Noida without any transfer order under section 127. The tribunal held that without proper jurisdictional transfer, the assessment was invalid in law. Following precedents, the assessment order was quashed on this legal ground, rendering other issues academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 507 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770235</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi quashed an assessment order framed under section 143(3) due to jurisdictional defects. The notice under section 143(2) was issued by ITO Ward 38(2) New Delhi, but the assessment was completed by ITO Ward 5(2)(3) Noida without any transfer order under section 127. The tribunal held that without proper jurisdictional transfer, the assessment was invalid in law. Following precedents, the assessment order was quashed on this legal ground, rendering other issues academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>