<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 520 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770248</link>
    <description>The SC/HC precedents guided the Tribunal&#039;s decision to quash a tax reassessment due to the AO&#039;s failure to provide reasons for reopening under section 148(2). Despite the Revenue&#039;s allegations of bogus long-term capital gains transactions, the Tribunal invalidated the assessment because the assessee was not supplied the reasons for reopening despite repeated requests. The procedural defect was deemed fatal, resulting in the reassessment order being set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 520 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770248</link>
      <description>The SC/HC precedents guided the Tribunal&#039;s decision to quash a tax reassessment due to the AO&#039;s failure to provide reasons for reopening under section 148(2). Despite the Revenue&#039;s allegations of bogus long-term capital gains transactions, the Tribunal invalidated the assessment because the assessee was not supplied the reasons for reopening despite repeated requests. The procedural defect was deemed fatal, resulting in the reassessment order being set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>