<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 521 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770249</link>
    <description>Processing under section 143(1) cannot be used to deny the benefit of the concessional tax regime under section 115BAA or invoke section 115JB where the issue is disputed and debatable. An adverse adjustment of this kind, made without issuing a show cause notice, exceeds the limited scope of prima facie processing. The intimation under section 143(1) was therefore held invalid and the adjustment was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 521 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770249</link>
      <description>Processing under section 143(1) cannot be used to deny the benefit of the concessional tax regime under section 115BAA or invoke section 115JB where the issue is disputed and debatable. An adverse adjustment of this kind, made without issuing a show cause notice, exceeds the limited scope of prima facie processing. The intimation under section 143(1) was therefore held invalid and the adjustment was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>