<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 523 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770251</link>
    <description>Karnataka HC set aside the final assessment order passed without awaiting DRP directions. The petitioner had filed objections before DRT within the cut-off date of 09.03.2025. Court found the petitioner&#039;s failure to communicate with respondent was due to bona fide reasons and unavoidable circumstances. The impugned order was deemed inappropriate as it bypassed the mandatory DRP process, warranting judicial intervention with necessary directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 523 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770251</link>
      <description>Karnataka HC set aside the final assessment order passed without awaiting DRP directions. The petitioner had filed objections before DRT within the cut-off date of 09.03.2025. Court found the petitioner&#039;s failure to communicate with respondent was due to bona fide reasons and unavoidable circumstances. The impugned order was deemed inappropriate as it bypassed the mandatory DRP process, warranting judicial intervention with necessary directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>