<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 528 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770256</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding unexplained share capital. The court found no violation of Rule 46-A and confirmed that conversion of liability into share capital without cash involvement does not constitute unexplained credits. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the Rs. 3,98,44,628/- addition was deemed legally justified based on established precedents and factual evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 528 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770256</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding unexplained share capital. The court found no violation of Rule 46-A and confirmed that conversion of liability into share capital without cash involvement does not constitute unexplained credits. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the Rs. 3,98,44,628/- addition was deemed legally justified based on established precedents and factual evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>