<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 529 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770257</link>
    <description>SC upheld ITAT&#039;s decision quashing an assessment order due to jurisdictional defect. The AO lacked proper jurisdiction to issue the notice and assessment under Section 143(3) of Income Tax Act. Despite potential tax evasion allegations, the Court prioritized procedural validity, ruling that jurisdictional competence is fundamental to assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 09:13:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 529 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770257</link>
      <description>SC upheld ITAT&#039;s decision quashing an assessment order due to jurisdictional defect. The AO lacked proper jurisdiction to issue the notice and assessment under Section 143(3) of Income Tax Act. Despite potential tax evasion allegations, the Court prioritized procedural validity, ruling that jurisdictional competence is fundamental to assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>