<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 533 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770261</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the HC&#039;s decision that the dispute resolution panel (DRP) has authority to issue directions only during pending assessment proceedings under Section 144C(5). Once the assessment order is passed, the proceedings conclude, and the DRP loses jurisdiction to issue further directions. Consequently, the SC dismissed the special leave petition and affirmed the quashing of the DRP&#039;s directions and the related assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 533 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770261</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the HC&#039;s decision that the dispute resolution panel (DRP) has authority to issue directions only during pending assessment proceedings under Section 144C(5). Once the assessment order is passed, the proceedings conclude, and the DRP loses jurisdiction to issue further directions. Consequently, the SC dismissed the special leave petition and affirmed the quashing of the DRP&#039;s directions and the related assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>