<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 536 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770264</link>
    <description>SLP dismissed by SC for a 282-day unexplained delay; pending applications disposed. The HC had found that the assessee provided complete evidence (contract notes, demat details, bonus-share information) for penny-stock sales, transactions executed on BSE with STT paid, and no allegation of broker price manipulation, but SC declined to entertain the petition solely on delay grounds without addressing merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 536 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770264</link>
      <description>SLP dismissed by SC for a 282-day unexplained delay; pending applications disposed. The HC had found that the assessee provided complete evidence (contract notes, demat details, bonus-share information) for penny-stock sales, transactions executed on BSE with STT paid, and no allegation of broker price manipulation, but SC declined to entertain the petition solely on delay grounds without addressing merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>