<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (5) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43502</link>
    <description>Public interest immunity over unpublished official records and Cabinet papers is not absolute; the Court may examine the claim by judicial review, including in camera inspection, and balance State confidentiality against the public interest in the administration of justice. Article 74(2) protects only the actual advice tendered by the Council of Ministers to the President, not every connected document in the file. On tribunal appointments, the executive may appoint a statutorily qualified member as President, and the Court will not interfere merely on allegations or comparative merit. The decision also stresses that rules and convention should support judicial independence and public confidence, with scope for inquiry into the Tribunal&#039;s functioning and possible amendment of the rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (5) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43502</link>
      <description>Public interest immunity over unpublished official records and Cabinet papers is not absolute; the Court may examine the claim by judicial review, including in camera inspection, and balance State confidentiality against the public interest in the administration of justice. Article 74(2) protects only the actual advice tendered by the Council of Ministers to the President, not every connected document in the file. On tribunal appointments, the executive may appoint a statutorily qualified member as President, and the Court will not interfere merely on allegations or comparative merit. The decision also stresses that rules and convention should support judicial independence and public confidence, with scope for inquiry into the Tribunal&#039;s functioning and possible amendment of the rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>