<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 557 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770285</link>
    <description>The SC examined a tax dispute involving alleged fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims under the CGST Act. The Court upheld the penalty order while directing the tax department to provide relied-upon documents to the petitioner. The Court mandated that the petitioner can file an appeal within 30 days of receiving documents, ensuring procedural fairness and the right to challenge the penalty order through statutory appellate mechanisms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 10:03:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 557 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770285</link>
      <description>The SC examined a tax dispute involving alleged fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims under the CGST Act. The Court upheld the penalty order while directing the tax department to provide relied-upon documents to the petitioner. The Court mandated that the petitioner can file an appeal within 30 days of receiving documents, ensuring procedural fairness and the right to challenge the penalty order through statutory appellate mechanisms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>