<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 468 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770196</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue the statutory appellate remedy against the impugned order. If the appeal is filed within the permitted period, it must be considered on merits and not rejected on limitation. The operative effect is that the petitioner is directed to use the available appeal mechanism, while timely filing preserves substantive consideration of the challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 468 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770196</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue the statutory appellate remedy against the impugned order. If the appeal is filed within the permitted period, it must be considered on merits and not rejected on limitation. The operative effect is that the petitioner is directed to use the available appeal mechanism, while timely filing preserves substantive consideration of the challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>