<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 103 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43491</link>
    <description>The Court held that the summons issued under Section 108 of the Customs Act was valid and within the jurisdiction of the Customs Authorities. It was determined that the inquiry powers under Sections 107 and 108 are expansive and can persist post-clearance of goods if there is a reasonable suspicion of smuggling. The initial decision deeming the summons invalid was overturned, and the appeal was allowed without costs being awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:17:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 103 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43491</link>
      <description>The Court held that the summons issued under Section 108 of the Customs Act was valid and within the jurisdiction of the Customs Authorities. It was determined that the inquiry powers under Sections 107 and 108 are expansive and can persist post-clearance of goods if there is a reasonable suspicion of smuggling. The initial decision deeming the summons invalid was overturned, and the appeal was allowed without costs being awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>