<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43485</link>
    <description>An approved classification list under Rule 173B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 cannot be reopened merely because the department later adopts a different view on exemption entitlement under an amended notification. Where the assessee disclosed the relevant notifications and answered the authority&#039;s queries, and the record shows no fraud, misrepresentation, or concealment of material facts, the approval remains protected. The authority&#039;s power to modify or recall the approved list is confined to cases where approval was obtained by fraud, misrepresentation, or concealment. In the absence of such vitiating factors, a show cause notice to revise the approval is without jurisdiction and the consequential demand is not recoverable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:44:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43485</link>
      <description>An approved classification list under Rule 173B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 cannot be reopened merely because the department later adopts a different view on exemption entitlement under an amended notification. Where the assessee disclosed the relevant notifications and answered the authority&#039;s queries, and the record shows no fraud, misrepresentation, or concealment of material facts, the approval remains protected. The authority&#039;s power to modify or recall the approved list is confined to cases where approval was obtained by fraud, misrepresentation, or concealment. In the absence of such vitiating factors, a show cause notice to revise the approval is without jurisdiction and the consequential demand is not recoverable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>