<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 104 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43484</link>
    <description>The court quashed the impugned order and remanded the case for a fresh decision by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) as the appellate authority did not allow the petitioner to establish the existence of contracts supporting the price list. The court emphasized the importance of considering all issues raised by the petitioner and directed the authority to proceed in accordance with the law, leaving the appeal process open for further review based on any additional evidence the petitioner might submit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 104 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43484</link>
      <description>The court quashed the impugned order and remanded the case for a fresh decision by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) as the appellate authority did not allow the petitioner to establish the existence of contracts supporting the price list. The court emphasized the importance of considering all issues raised by the petitioner and directed the authority to proceed in accordance with the law, leaving the appeal process open for further review based on any additional evidence the petitioner might submit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>