https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43482 Interference with demand-cum-show cause notices under Central Excise law was found unwarranted at the threshold because the notices had only commenced proceedings and no final adjudication had been made. The petitioner had already submitted a reply, which the competent authority was required to examine and decide on merits in accordance with law. The Court therefore declined to stall the statutory process at the show-cause stage and left the petitioner to pursue remedies after final adjudication if still aggrieved. en-us Wed, 29 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:40:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43482 Interference with demand-cum-show cause notices under Central Excise law was found unwarranted at the threshold because the notices had only commenced proceedings and no final adjudication had been made. The petitioner had already submitted a reply, which the competent authority was required to examine and decide on merits in accordance with law. The Court therefore declined to stall the statutory process at the show-cause stage and left the petitioner to pursue remedies after final adjudication if still aggrieved. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43482