<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 455 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770183</link>
    <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that imported Quick Lime with 92% purity should be classified under CTH 2522 1000 rather than CTH 2825 9090. The tribunal ruled that Quick Lime falls under CTH 2522 unless chemical analysis proves 98% calcium oxide purity. Since the product had only 92% purity, and CTH 2522 1000 provides specific classification while CTH 2825 9090 is merely a residuary entry, the specific heading takes precedence per interpretative classification rules. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 09:18:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 455 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770183</link>
      <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that imported Quick Lime with 92% purity should be classified under CTH 2522 1000 rather than CTH 2825 9090. The tribunal ruled that Quick Lime falls under CTH 2522 unless chemical analysis proves 98% calcium oxide purity. Since the product had only 92% purity, and CTH 2522 1000 provides specific classification while CTH 2825 9090 is merely a residuary entry, the specific heading takes precedence per interpretative classification rules. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>