<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cheque Bounce Case: Accused&#039;s Liability Confirmed with Uncontested Debt and Failure to Repay Under Section 138</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88109</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the revision petition, upholding the accused&#039;s conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the accused issued a cheque for a legally enforceable debt, failed to rebut the presumption of liability, and did not pay the demanded amount despite receiving a valid notice. The court confirmed that the accused&#039;s signature on the cheque and failure to discharge the financial obligation satisfied all essential ingredients of the offense, thereby validating the lower courts&#039; concurrent findings of guilt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 09:18:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 09:18:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cheque Bounce Case: Accused&#039;s Liability Confirmed with Uncontested Debt and Failure to Repay Under Section 138</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88109</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the revision petition, upholding the accused&#039;s conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the accused issued a cheque for a legally enforceable debt, failed to rebut the presumption of liability, and did not pay the demanded amount despite receiving a valid notice. The court confirmed that the accused&#039;s signature on the cheque and failure to discharge the financial obligation satisfied all essential ingredients of the offense, thereby validating the lower courts&#039; concurrent findings of guilt.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 09:18:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>