<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 394 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770122</link>
    <description>The SC held that the HC cannot reject a plaint under Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction when statutory appellate remedies exist under CPC. The Court emphasized that procedural safeguards must not be bypassed, and substantive issues like Benami Act applicability require trial court adjudication. The HC&#039;s direct plaint rejection was deemed procedurally improper, and the case was remanded to the trial court for appropriate proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 09:18:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 394 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770122</link>
      <description>The SC held that the HC cannot reject a plaint under Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction when statutory appellate remedies exist under CPC. The Court emphasized that procedural safeguards must not be bypassed, and substantive issues like Benami Act applicability require trial court adjudication. The HC&#039;s direct plaint rejection was deemed procedurally improper, and the case was remanded to the trial court for appropriate proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>