<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 399 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770127</link>
    <description>Cross-objections cannot be used to seek quashing of an order that has already granted relief, where no independent appeal has been filed. The Tribunal treated such a challenge as an impermissible attempt to overturn the reasoning of the impugned order through a cross-objection in a departmental appeal. It also found no sufficient basis to disturb the findings recorded in favour of the respondents, as the departmental grounds did not justify interference with the earlier determination. The departmental appeal was therefore accepted and the cross-objections were rejected, leaving the earlier order intact for the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 09:18:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 399 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770127</link>
      <description>Cross-objections cannot be used to seek quashing of an order that has already granted relief, where no independent appeal has been filed. The Tribunal treated such a challenge as an impermissible attempt to overturn the reasoning of the impugned order through a cross-objection in a departmental appeal. It also found no sufficient basis to disturb the findings recorded in favour of the respondents, as the departmental grounds did not justify interference with the earlier determination. The departmental appeal was therefore accepted and the cross-objections were rejected, leaving the earlier order intact for the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>