<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 403 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770131</link>
    <description>Special Additional Duty on clearances by a 100% EOU to sister concerns in the Domestic Tariff Area was held to depend on whether the goods were liable to sales tax or VAT under Section 3(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975; the Tribunal followed the Larger Bench view that a stock transfer description and a State sales tax or VAT exemption do not by themselves defeat the central levy, so the demand was upheld on that issue. For expired tablets, capsules, raw materials and remnants destroyed in the factory, the Tribunal found the factual record incomplete on customs permission and the timing of the destruction request, so it remanded the duty demand and connected limitation questions for fresh examination by the original authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 09:18:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 403 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770131</link>
      <description>Special Additional Duty on clearances by a 100% EOU to sister concerns in the Domestic Tariff Area was held to depend on whether the goods were liable to sales tax or VAT under Section 3(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975; the Tribunal followed the Larger Bench view that a stock transfer description and a State sales tax or VAT exemption do not by themselves defeat the central levy, so the demand was upheld on that issue. For expired tablets, capsules, raw materials and remnants destroyed in the factory, the Tribunal found the factual record incomplete on customs permission and the timing of the destruction request, so it remanded the duty demand and connected limitation questions for fresh examination by the original authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>