<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 404 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770132</link>
    <description>The SC examined the service tax liability of a sub-agent receiving incentives from an IATA agent for buying and selling airline cargo space. The court held that such incentives do not constitute taxable services under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) since the transaction involves only two parties and represents a trading activity. The court rejected the revenue&#039;s arguments, finding no service tax liability on volume-based discounts, and emphasized that incentives are not consideration for services rendered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 09:18:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 404 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770132</link>
      <description>The SC examined the service tax liability of a sub-agent receiving incentives from an IATA agent for buying and selling airline cargo space. The court held that such incentives do not constitute taxable services under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) since the transaction involves only two parties and represents a trading activity. The court rejected the revenue&#039;s arguments, finding no service tax liability on volume-based discounts, and emphasized that incentives are not consideration for services rendered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>