<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 412 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770140</link>
    <description>The SC upheld SEBI&#039;s authority to terminate an Administrator&#039;s appointment in recovery proceedings. The Court found SEBI&#039;s termination communication valid, without casting any stigma on the Administrator. While rejecting reinstatement, the Court directed SEBI to determine and pay outstanding remuneration within eight weeks, with the Administrator retaining the right to challenge the assessment through appropriate legal remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 09:18:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 412 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770140</link>
      <description>The SC upheld SEBI&#039;s authority to terminate an Administrator&#039;s appointment in recovery proceedings. The Court found SEBI&#039;s termination communication valid, without casting any stigma on the Administrator. While rejecting reinstatement, the Court directed SEBI to determine and pay outstanding remuneration within eight weeks, with the Administrator retaining the right to challenge the assessment through appropriate legal remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>