https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770141 CESTAT Chennai dismissed an appeal by an importer for non-prosecution under Rule 20, citing repeated failure to appear despite notices. The Tribunal followed SC precedent allowing dismissal for non-appearance while preserving appellant's right to seek restoration by presenting justifiable cause. The case involved allegations of customs duty evasion through goods misclassification and undervaluation. en-us Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 May 2025 09:18:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770141 CESTAT Chennai dismissed an appeal by an importer for non-prosecution under Rule 20, citing repeated failure to appear despite notices. The Tribunal followed SC precedent allowing dismissal for non-appearance while preserving appellant's right to seek restoration by presenting justifiable cause. The case involved allegations of customs duty evasion through goods misclassification and undervaluation. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770141