<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 420 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770148</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata upheld absolute confiscation of foreign origin black pepper smuggled through non-notified routes violating Section 46 of Customs Act, 1962. Appellant claimed goods were ordered through intermediary Ashish, but failed to provide any evidence of this person&#039;s existence or whereabouts. Tribunal found Ashish to be fictitious, established appellant&#039;s mens rea for smuggling large quantities worth crores while evading duty payment. No payment proof or legitimate acquisition evidence presented. Penalty reduced to Rs. 1,00,000. Appeal allowed in part with confiscation and modified penalty upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 09:18:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 420 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770148</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata upheld absolute confiscation of foreign origin black pepper smuggled through non-notified routes violating Section 46 of Customs Act, 1962. Appellant claimed goods were ordered through intermediary Ashish, but failed to provide any evidence of this person&#039;s existence or whereabouts. Tribunal found Ashish to be fictitious, established appellant&#039;s mens rea for smuggling large quantities worth crores while evading duty payment. No payment proof or legitimate acquisition evidence presented. Penalty reduced to Rs. 1,00,000. Appeal allowed in part with confiscation and modified penalty upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>