https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770150 Delhi HC dismissed petitioner's challenge to Policy Review Committee's rejection of MEIS benefits claim for shipping bills exported to Egypt, Algeria, Libya and Romania during July 2015-August 2016. Court held that policy relaxation is discretionary, not a substantive right. For 6 of 8 shipping bills, payment was realized within 3 years allowing MEIS benefits with late cut, but petitioner failed to claim. Remaining payments were received beyond stipulated period. PRC's rejection was neither arbitrary nor unreasonable, warranting no judicial interference under Article 226. en-us Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 May 2025 09:18:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770150 Delhi HC dismissed petitioner's challenge to Policy Review Committee's rejection of MEIS benefits claim for shipping bills exported to Egypt, Algeria, Libya and Romania during July 2015-August 2016. Court held that policy relaxation is discretionary, not a substantive right. For 6 of 8 shipping bills, payment was realized within 3 years allowing MEIS benefits with late cut, but petitioner failed to claim. Remaining payments were received beyond stipulated period. PRC's rejection was neither arbitrary nor unreasonable, warranting no judicial interference under Article 226. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770150