<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 53 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43475</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, finding that the Additional Collector erred in imposing a personal penalty on the master of the vessel and confiscating the vessel under the Customs Act, 1962. The court held that there was no legal basis to support these actions and ordered the impugned parts of the order to be struck down, thereby granting relief to the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:26:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 53 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43475</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, finding that the Additional Collector erred in imposing a personal penalty on the master of the vessel and confiscating the vessel under the Customs Act, 1962. The court held that there was no legal basis to support these actions and ordered the impugned parts of the order to be struck down, thereby granting relief to the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>