<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 438 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770166</link>
    <description>ITAT Kolkata allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding denial of Foreign Tax Credit for taxes paid in USA. The tribunal held that filing Form No. 67 is directory, not mandatory, and FTC cannot be denied solely due to delayed filing beyond the prescribed time limit under rule 128(9) of Income-tax Rules, 1962. Following precedents from Madras HC and other ITAT decisions, the tribunal directed the AO to grant FTC benefits for foreign taxes paid in accordance with law and India-USA DTAA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 09:18:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 438 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770166</link>
      <description>ITAT Kolkata allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding denial of Foreign Tax Credit for taxes paid in USA. The tribunal held that filing Form No. 67 is directory, not mandatory, and FTC cannot be denied solely due to delayed filing beyond the prescribed time limit under rule 128(9) of Income-tax Rules, 1962. Following precedents from Madras HC and other ITAT decisions, the tribunal directed the AO to grant FTC benefits for foreign taxes paid in accordance with law and India-USA DTAA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>