<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 445 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770173</link>
    <description>The HC held that reassessment proceedings initiated under Sections 147/148 were invalid as the preconditions under Section 149(1A) of the Income Tax Act were not met. It reiterated that, post-2021, escaped income exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs may be computed cumulatively over multiple years only where such income is represented by an &quot;asset&quot; or by &quot;expenditure in relation to an event or occasion.&quot; On the facts, the Revenue failed to establish that the alleged escaped income was so represented. Consequently, the notice under Section 148 was issued beyond the permissible limitation period under Section 149(1)(b), rendering the reassessment without jurisdiction. The reassessment proceedings were quashed and the petition allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=820023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 445 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770173</link>
      <description>The HC held that reassessment proceedings initiated under Sections 147/148 were invalid as the preconditions under Section 149(1A) of the Income Tax Act were not met. It reiterated that, post-2021, escaped income exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs may be computed cumulatively over multiple years only where such income is represented by an &quot;asset&quot; or by &quot;expenditure in relation to an event or occasion.&quot; On the facts, the Revenue failed to establish that the alleged escaped income was so represented. Consequently, the notice under Section 148 was issued beyond the permissible limitation period under Section 149(1)(b), rendering the reassessment without jurisdiction. The reassessment proceedings were quashed and the petition allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>