https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43468 The court acknowledged the delay in the authorities' decision on the customs duty demand challenge, emphasizing the need for prompt resolution. As the petitioner complied with court directions by submitting required documents within the specified time, the revival of recovery proceedings was deemed unjust. With no counter-affidavit filed, the court assumed the petition's facts were correct, supporting the claim of unfair treatment. The court disposed of the petition, directing a stay of recovery proceedings until a decision was made on the dispute, subject to serving the court's order on the respondents. en-us Mon, 06 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:16:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43468 The court acknowledged the delay in the authorities' decision on the customs duty demand challenge, emphasizing the need for prompt resolution. As the petitioner complied with court directions by submitting required documents within the specified time, the revival of recovery proceedings was deemed unjust. With no counter-affidavit filed, the court assumed the petition's facts were correct, supporting the claim of unfair treatment. The court disposed of the petition, directing a stay of recovery proceedings until a decision was made on the dispute, subject to serving the court's order on the respondents. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 06 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43468