<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 61 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43467</link>
    <description>Excise valuation of surplus goods diverted and sold by a dealer must reflect the basic character of excise as a duty on manufacture, not on resale. The assessable value is therefore the wholesale cash price at the factory gate of the original manufacturer, or the alternative method under Section 4 where that price cannot be ascertained; the dealer&#039;s own market sale price is excluded because it includes post-manufacturing elements and profit. For diverted surplus goods, the relevant valuation date is the date of actual removal from the dealer&#039;s premises, not the date of manufacture or original purchase. A demand based on the dealer&#039;s resale price cannot stand and requires fresh assessment on the correct basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:14:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 61 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43467</link>
      <description>Excise valuation of surplus goods diverted and sold by a dealer must reflect the basic character of excise as a duty on manufacture, not on resale. The assessable value is therefore the wholesale cash price at the factory gate of the original manufacturer, or the alternative method under Section 4 where that price cannot be ascertained; the dealer&#039;s own market sale price is excluded because it includes post-manufacturing elements and profit. For diverted surplus goods, the relevant valuation date is the date of actual removal from the dealer&#039;s premises, not the date of manufacture or original purchase. A demand based on the dealer&#039;s resale price cannot stand and requires fresh assessment on the correct basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>