<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1453 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461887</link>
    <description>SC dismissed civil appeals due to 312-day delay in filing, which was not adequately explained by appellant. The court found no compelling reason to intervene with the original tribunal order. Appeals were rejected both on procedural grounds of delay and substantive merits, with pending applications also disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 18:56:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1453 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461887</link>
      <description>SC dismissed civil appeals due to 312-day delay in filing, which was not adequately explained by appellant. The court found no compelling reason to intervene with the original tribunal order. Appeals were rejected both on procedural grounds of delay and substantive merits, with pending applications also disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>