<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1448 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461888</link>
    <description>AT ruled in favor of the cooperative society on two key tax issues:First, interest income from savings bank accounts was deemed eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d), distinguishing the case from prior SC precedent by highlighting the deposits were not from retained member amounts. The Tribunal rejected Revenue&#039;s challenge, finding the interest income qualified for tax exemption.Second, the Tribunal upheld the Provident Fund deduction, accepting the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning that enhanced income remains eligible for section 80P deduction. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was ultimately dismissed on both grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 18:56:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1448 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461888</link>
      <description>AT ruled in favor of the cooperative society on two key tax issues:First, interest income from savings bank accounts was deemed eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d), distinguishing the case from prior SC precedent by highlighting the deposits were not from retained member amounts. The Tribunal rejected Revenue&#039;s challenge, finding the interest income qualified for tax exemption.Second, the Tribunal upheld the Provident Fund deduction, accepting the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning that enhanced income remains eligible for section 80P deduction. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was ultimately dismissed on both grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>