https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43462 The Court directed the release of goods to the petitioner upon payment of port charges and evidence of customs clearance. The auction deposit was to be refunded to Respondent No. 5 with a solatium of Rs. 30,000. The petitioner was ordered to pay costs and withdraw the writ petition from the High Court, which was disposed of as infructuous. The Court clarified that the petitioner could seek a refund of port charges upon producing a Detention Certificate, with the merit of the claim to be determined according to the law. en-us Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:05:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43462 The Court directed the release of goods to the petitioner upon payment of port charges and evidence of customs clearance. The auction deposit was to be refunded to Respondent No. 5 with a solatium of Rs. 30,000. The petitioner was ordered to pay costs and withdraw the writ petition from the High Court, which was disposed of as infructuous. The Court clarified that the petitioner could seek a refund of port charges upon producing a Detention Certificate, with the merit of the claim to be determined according to the law. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43462