<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 122 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43454</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition in part, quashing certain orders and directing the Appellate Collector to restore and decide the appeal on its merits, finding that the delay in filing the appeal should have been condoned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:47:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 122 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43454</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition in part, quashing certain orders and directing the Appellate Collector to restore and decide the appeal on its merits, finding that the delay in filing the appeal should have been condoned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>