<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 391 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770119</link>
    <description>HC upheld constitutionality of Section 174(2) of Kerala State GST Act in Writ Appeal. Division Bench dismissed the appeal, but granted dealers liberty to pursue statutory remedies within eight weeks. Authorities directed to entertain appeals/revisions on merits, without considering delay during litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 09:59:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=819803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 391 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770119</link>
      <description>HC upheld constitutionality of Section 174(2) of Kerala State GST Act in Writ Appeal. Division Bench dismissed the appeal, but granted dealers liberty to pursue statutory remedies within eight weeks. Authorities directed to entertain appeals/revisions on merits, without considering delay during litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=770119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>